Saturday, March 1, 2008

On sex, the Kerala phenomenon, and related derivatives

Consciously aware of the relatively risque nature that this post has the potential to have, I shall take the first step by diplomatically confirming that, "nothing can be confirmed at the moment".
It is up to you now, to further investigate, and read on.

Bollywood, or the 'Indian Film Industry', as some within it prefer to refer to it as, for some reason has, in recent times, become the bastion of present and potential sex symbols.
It is openly admitted in the deeply rhetorical speeches conched out come every awards night. It is there in the fact that while some male stars branded 'evergreen' and 'timeless' have the right to come up on stage and make the token announcements, but in their accompaniment can only be females fresh off enhottening plants. It is there in every single music video.
My class VII teacher had referred to our society as blatantly racist, what with the mad race in fairness creams et al. Today I can see our film industry as a living and thriving example of a similar, if not same, sentiment.

My fundamental question is, why do our male leads HAVE to be hand chiseled Greek Gods, and females testosterone inducing ostentatious level "pieces of meat".
Before I return to this problem, lets look at an alternate dimension, existing a few thousand miles down south.

We arrive at God's own country.
More specifically to its film industry.
This, along with the industries of the other 3, is scoffed at often, by the "Neo-Nazi-Aryanist" that lies latent within many uptowners. The degrees of such intolerance of course vary, and so too does the persistence subsequent to enlightening experiences.

Anyhow, a primary premise for all this ridicule is the lack of film star level shapeliness that we've grown so used to. People mock Mohanlal for being obese, and caricaturize him in comparison with the cream of our bolly "talent". They fling imaginary tomatoes at female leads whose only fault is not embarking on insane diets in order to stay impossibly defiant of the onset of time and family. They obviously chose not to consider some of the brilliance that these ACTORS, with their DIRECTORS et al churn out, for reasons that go beyond lingual barriers.
The people who form the primary market for these ACTORS though remain unruffled. In fact they've got the best of both worlds. Uptowners to ogle at, and locals to appreciate.
But why is it that they don't crave for the same level of "aesthetics" from their superstars. Why is it that they don't look for models in their cinema? Why is it that an Upen Patel is yet to successfully venture into the scene there?

There would be many reasons for the appreciation of real acting down there, as opposed to whatever it is that attracts balls uptown.
I, would like to draw an unlikely connection, with what is referred to as the "Kerala Phenomenon".

It is well known that Kerala has uncharacteristically (for a country in India's position) high levels of literacy, social equity (touch wood both of ya!) and political activism (and some part of you too!). In short, its Human Development Indices are high, and indicate a pretty picture of the level of life et al.
However what the HDIs unsuccessfully conceal is the rampant unemployment, underemployment and their other cronies that plague life at every level.]
Effectively, what Kerala had chosen for itself, was a path of human development BEFORE economic development. This then led to the brain drain to the beloved Gelff (for the seriously uninitiated, thats 'Gulf') and all the evils that come with an over qualified and under served work force.

Perhaps it is the HDIs that increase the "ability-to-appreciate-finer-things" quotient in peoples. Perhaps in the state that we were 60.5 years back, it wasn't possible to take both HDI and GDP forward together. Perhaps things would've been a bit different had we let go of the self inflicted poison injection that was Nehruvian -> Indira Socialism. Perhaps Kerala did the right thing by going against the world trend of going for economic development in a phase marked by widespread labour exploitation, and then hope for the HDI's to pick up with the fruits of labour. Perhaps when the uptowners raise their HDIs, they too shall be more perceptive. Perhaps not. All this is SO not for me to comment on. Though I would desperately hope so.

I do not know if any such "model" was ever endorsed as such, but logical concludable results and factors can be seen at the wiki Kerala model page.

Ok, so now you've learnt of my prejudices against the current state of the "Indian Film Industry" (read Bollywood) and you've seen what the Kerala Model was.

In case the links aren't becoming visible in front of your eyes, then I shall jump in.
SURELY, the fact that every "economically developed" dominion tends to be more "appreciative" of the flesh entering every aspect of their existence, cannot be mere coincidence. Take the uptowners (as they've been referred to till now).
Look around you for crying out loud!
The malls! An ad for socks, has a lady wearing them, and coincidentally nothing much else. A bill board for spectacle lenses has one wearing them in a way that a toddler wouldn't know if they were for the eyes or for the voluptuous bosoms underneath them.
Every second music album has pieces with added sound effects echoing expressions reminiscent of titles such as these. (For the record, this movie escapes my net of wrath, as it probably dealt with a theme genuinely related to said subject matter (albeit slightly eroticised, or maybe not.))

People, why the overt sexuality everywhere? Is this what economic development defines as being "modern"?

Kerala on the other hand, has somehow (for more good than bad, as of now at least), managed to educate the masses without losing touch with basic sensibilities of taste and culture. Yes, it DESPERATELY needs to develop economically, as the evils mentioned previously shall soon grow to usurp any good done till now.

Does modernity HAVE to come with a general increase in public appearances of that sentiment that sounds so like (ONLY in name rhyme-ness!) the great physician Charak of old times?
Do all subjects of the New World necessarily have to be subjected to this rigorous course in becoming bonafide "Hawas ke pujaari"? (i LOVE that phrase!)

With Kerala, I can only hope for my beloved to be able hold on to her essence as she prepares to walk into a new tomorrow.

I'll wait for a day, when our society can move (in its thought, its attitude, its essence) from


to


And one hell of a wait it'll be as well!
Sigh......

Socho duniya... Please.

PS: Bangalore and the likes have been kept out, owing to personal ignorance. Pointless stereotyping is below me.

8 comments:

arvind batra said...

Some more angles:

1. I read a blog post (like this) somewhere (cant remember) and it remarked that most of the news anchors these days are young and (mostly) females. The post compared with the DD anchors few years back and how the way of delivering news has changed so much. I think this is also (somewhat) related to what you are trying to say.

2. The cheap acts are not just limited to bollywood, they are everywhere. Eg. Look at any shaggy video, even the beautiful song - Hope - is filmed in a way that is questionable. Hollywood movies also follow the same model. May be in a more polished way.

My attempt to explain the phenomenon:
I like the example of Mahesh Bhatt. He made Daddy and Zakhm and then started producing flicks like murder etc. I saw his interview where the interviewer asked him why (or how) did he change so much. He replied straightly stating 2 points: (a) It sells (b) Thats what the people want and i will give them.

Why it sells..well it is connected to many problems.

Coming to the Kerala phenomenon..other than the wiki article, i have my own ideas (and they can be wrong)
1. Southern India generally has been more conservative than north india. So that might be a reason.

2.Modernization/Capitalism is based on the motive of getting profit and the means are not important. So they didnt had any motive to pursue such a line earlier. And let me also add that if you look at the current scene in Kerala, with all the modernization coming, their are also moving towards the so-called bollywood style. There are huge sized billboards selling jewellery with models wearing only a necklace etc.

It will be a good study on how to achieve industrialization without taking such steps. Something you can do while you do an mba :)

And lastly, the video of Dear prudence is very good.

antidefinitionist said...

Just walking the treaded path is something which comes easily to anybody. And when people refuse to diversify or experiment, it starts hurting.

If good movies dont get audience, then it means, there is some flaw in the system itself. Marketing and too much of managing is, maybe, taking its toll on the other films.

aman said...

A very well put up viewpoint and convincing too. I am a big admirer of South Indian life, food and its intellectual capital and the beauty of God's own country. But before I buy your argument, I just want to ensure that u didnt overlook a few points.
1. The North South Divide, believe it or not, is there unfortunately. I myself have experienced it during my visits to South. People there believe that North India is draining the 'capital'(used in a loose sense) created by the south. For e.g, South India has been good in adhering to the population measures. In lieu it has been punished with reducing number of seats in parliament which r still alloted by the headcounts. Anyways, my point is Can this divide (or resentment) be responsible for north indian actors not making it big in south and vice versa.

2. Commercialisation is pervasive and visible everywhre. Even South Indian filmdom is fraught with superstardom, fanmania etc..which arguably kills objectivism while appreciating any artform. Can MohanlLal, RajniKant be a case in this regard just as it happens in North?

3. Many critics argue that South 'has been' very conservationist and hence didnt welcome western influences like 'eye candies in form of actors etc'. Note the words 'has been' which means that this might change in future. So, if this argument is true, then we will see more eye candies in Malayam industry as well, as the aggressive commercial and carnal forces push those strong walls of conservationism. These analysts prove their point with the fact that more and more north indian actrsses are coming to these films even though they might not be successful at this time.

4. I think that pushing HDI before EDI is a good idea but not always. A strategy had to be dynamic and responsive to the changing situations.You have to kind of use both of them to synergize each other to attain proper balance. I think education and the need of education should go hand in hand. I am not talking about the basic education here which is surely a necessity. But consider higher education. It is more or less a commodity. People buy it only if it will sell i.e get u an employement etc. So, if now Kerala sees that its EDI is lagging far behind its HDI, it should reconsider its strategy while North should learn from Kerala and pull up its HDI. Infact its the lack of HDI in North that is responsible for such a high crime rate in all those uptown cities.

Nice article , once again...Would love to hear ur thoughts on these interjections/..

Justin said...

@Batra...
--------

1. indeed.. this mushrooming of "pretty-young-thing" newsreaders is a more latent aspect of the same issue...

2. absolutely... but this is still relatively new in our "contemporary culture"..
and i wanted to draw the parallelism between this new arrival, and the onslaught of "new wealth" that has hit our society today...

is this just coincidence...?

also, i like the mahest bhatt answer as well... bcoz i'm of the impression that the free market is the best judge of "what society really WANTS"...

but my question then is, WHY does society now want all the skin, all of a sudden...?

it is easy to see, that india has in recent history been a society that has encouraged the suppression of sexuality in general.. when a society shifts from the hay day of ajanta ellora, to a time when the very mention of the word becomes a social faux pas and the focus of all awkwardness, u kno SOMETHING must be getting pent up inside, waiting for its turn to outburst...

perhaps our population explosion was a sign of this outburst, waiting in the wings...

then i am lead to, if this really was a phenomenon waiting to rebel, WHY only upon the revival of the economy...

i think we can factor it out something like this...

with the economy beginning to boom in the early nineties, we were in the midst of a storm intent on taking us from a state of repressed ambitions, to one where the even the sky was no cap on dreams et al, in EVERY aspect of our existence...
so while at one corner we had a freer ambani starting to spread his wings uninhibited, on the other we had housewives stepping out from centuries of patriarchal oppression...
while at one place the intelligentsia was "oohing and aahing" at every new reform thrown up, at the village corners, for very invisible reasons, life WAS changing for the farmer, his kids, and the daily wage laborer who now had a job in a lush new factory...

thus, as india arose from the ashes of decades of self inflicted socio-economic subjugation, there were several palpable and invisible connected implosions and explosions of joy and life...

in the midst of all this change and inevitable chaos, it was perhaps natural for all those centuries of pent up sexuality also to rise to the surface... the fact that aids and naco made a dramatic entry into our public and private spaces only added to the revolution...

writing about all these factors that cud've contributed to the story taking shape, its clearly not possible to classify the phenomenon as "good" or "bad"...

tho yes, i would be adamant on one point here...
at SOME point, it became "cool", to be "broad minded" and "open" to new ideas...
so the expressions of natural reprisals of the mind, body and consciousness, with time got converted to explicit expressions of one's "freedom"...

it is for all these reasons and their complex corruptible permutations, that i believe we today have a market for creativity bordering on sleaze and constant hawas..


coming to kerala...
1. yes, traditional conservatism must definitely hav a link...
2. yes again, kerala too is slowly treading towards the same path...
which is why i maaroed the sentiaap...
"With Kerala, I can only hope for my beloved to be able hold on to her essence as she prepares to walk into a new tomorrow."

and for the sake of objective completeness... mallu cinema too has followed the general decent (if that may be termed so) that the rest of the country has seen... but the point was the fact that the (still intact) occasional bursts of REAL cinematic gold (arising frm the fact that REAL actors are cherished for what they are...) are neglected in the midst of all the body mass index ridicule...

i shall not touch on why female actors still do not seem to hav a similar acting longevity as do male actors.

is industrialization even POSSIBLE without such a culture hot pot phenomenon...? well, sure hope i make it to a nice bschool where more answers await me...

and lastly, indeed... the video was very beautiful...
sigh..

cheers mateys!

Justin said...

@antidefinitionist...
---

the point never really was the current state of indian cinema, tho that is a direct derivative of the state of the indian psyche...

the interplay between an economy in bloom, and consequently the new lease of life to all parties concerned, and the increase in explicit-ness in society in general, is what is fascinating/scaring me today...

refer to the last reply (@Batra)..

Justin said...

@Aman..
-----

1. i did understand there to be a general reciprocative sense of mild tension between the north and south... exemplified by the dmk-aiadmk stance on hindi et al, and the near-racist stereotyping of southerners uptown... tho i wasnt consciously aware of any such pointed instances of resentment or anything...
plus i was more pointing out the fact that unlike in the north, there was still a market for real actors in kerala (i wont generalize to include entire south, owing to ignorance), independent (to an infinitely greater extent than uptown) of how an actor "looked" like...

2. yes, the south too is affected by the "defects" of fanmania etal, which make the experience of cinema as a pure artistic endeavour very diluted and skewed in prioritization...
but there again, one can point out that the fanmania doesnt demand a supermodel figure from its demigod filmstars... so both male and female actors can afford to live normal lives, and do what they do best..
and yes, this restricts entry for pple like upen patel... (WHY do i resent him SO much...?!)

3. hmmm.... i cant disagree on that point really.. and if we were to continue on the idea that is the basis of this entire discussion...
this potential onset of the skin revolution in kerala WILL coincide with a phase where we are desperately looking for means to develop economically... to increase FDI/GDP etal, in order to do justice to the HDI levels present right now...

4. true, most of the cultural differences cited in the post are probably attributable to the glaring HDI/EDI level diffrences...
kerala indeed does need to pull up its EDI socks, starting perhaps with industry, and higher education et al...

and yes the north can (and NEEDS to) take a leaf from kerala's HDI book...

this leads me to another question...
will the north, once it reaches a decent HDI, become more civilized, and appreciative of REAL talent et al...?

and will kerala become more of the beast that the uptown is today, in terms of intolerance, sexual explicit-ness, and other neo-relative-evils...

i can only hope, as i did originally as well...
"With Kerala, I can only hope for my beloved to be able hold on to her essence as she prepares to walk into a new tomorrow."

and thanxalot! :)
LOVELY discussion this has been...
do read up on the previous reply (@Batra) as well...

cheers!

Siddharth Sharma said...

interesting post. funny though that you don't mention the rampant underground soft porn industry in kerala. :)

thats what came to my mind first on looking at the post title :)

Justin said...

To conclude the story of Sid's point, which got played out on gmail instead of here back then:

Me:
-----
@Sid...

[blush blush blush] :)

but even then, at least the soft porn has a place allocated for it.. u don't find it permeating every aspect of human existence (ctrl+f "for crying out loud" on blog post page).

every society has its fair share of every human 'vikaar' and 'bhaav'.. diffrent places keep diffrent things underground... thats beyond my current issue..
MY concern is that it seems economic development seems to necessarily bring about a "revolution" of sexplicitness...
why must this happen..?
----

Sid:
----
it could be explained in a vague way by the freudian thesis that libido is the only real motivation.

the more sexplicit a society, the more expressed the desires of that society, the greater the striving after physical good, the greater the economic development :)
----

Me:
----
@Sid
indeed.. that would explain the string of curious observations i've been making over the recent past...

tho i wud think of it as:
the more free a society, the more its econ development (and vice versa here), the more the wealth and power in the hands of the many, the fewer the inhibitions in all aspects of living, the more the sexplicitness as well...

lets c where the world heads.. :)

cheers!
----

the end.

Cheers to South Park!

Q. - While people will always act within the bounds of human nature -- good people being good and bad people being bad, it takes religion to make good people bad.

A. - "Well, many religions also give people good reasons NOT to do bad things. And while people may do terrible things in the name of religion or via religion, they may have well still done them without the religion there -- it's just a justification provided for a choice already made."

-- Matt Stone & Trey Parker
(From South Park FAQ's)

Bet you didn't expect THIS from the ones who made Cartman and the gang! :)

Dilbert

Beatlemania!!!

Beatlemania!!!

BBC Sport | Football

BBC Sport | Formula 1